linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/8] locking/mcs: Better differentiate between mcs variants

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150114141603.GB12084@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:16:03 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] locking/mcs: Better differentiate between mcs
 variants


Correction, the build failure is probably due to the next patch 
in the series:

  locking: Use [READ,ASSIGN]_ONCE() for non-scalar types

If the reorganization patch tests out OK then I'll keep it in a 
monolithic form.

Thanks,

	Ingo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/