linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/8] locking/mcs: Better differentiate between mcs variants

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1421250926.2258.14.camel@stgolabs.net>
Date:	Wed, 14 Jan 2015 07:55:26 -0800
From:	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] locking/mcs: Better differentiate between mcs
 variants

Hi Ingo,

> x86 defconfig produces:
> 
>   kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h:81:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ASSIGN_ONCE’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 
> Also, this patch should really be split into three separate (and 
> tested) patches.

These patches were tested, the failure is because the ASSIGN_ONCE
function was renamed only yesterday (see
43239cbe79fc369f5d2160bd7f69e28b5c50a58c).

Thanks,
Davidlohr

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/