lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 07:55:26 -0800 From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] locking/mcs: Better differentiate between mcs variants Hi Ingo, > x86 defconfig produces: > > kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h:81:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ASSIGN_ONCE’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > Also, this patch should really be split into three separate (and > tested) patches. These patches were tested, the failure is because the ASSIGN_ONCE function was renamed only yesterday (see 43239cbe79fc369f5d2160bd7f69e28b5c50a58c). Thanks, Davidlohr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists