linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 0/4] Example changes using proposed sign

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1421254601-7242-1-git-send-email-martink@posteo.de>
Date:	Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:56:37 +0100
From:	Martin Kepplinger <martink@...teo.de>
To:	mingo@...nel.org
Cc:	peterz@...radead.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tytso@....edu,
	maxime.coquelin@...com, linux@...ck-us.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Example changes using proposed sign_extend functions


These are 4 of probably many examples of what could be changed if the proposed
sign_extend8, 16 and 64 are added to bitops.h, now as real patches.

Again, keep in mind, only take them if "PATCH v2 add sign_exted8, 16 and 64"
is included first.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/