[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150115103754.GC1698@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:37:54 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/entry changes for 3.20, round 1
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 05:59:26PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > Hi Ingo and Thomas,
> >
> > At Linus' suggestion, I'm trying out some maintainerish stuff for x86
> > entry code. Please consider pulling to an appropriate branch *after
> > Paul sends his RCU pull request*, only if 734d16801349 is included in
> > that pull request. If this goes well, maybe I'll submit a MAINTAINERS
> > patch, too.
> >
> > IMPORTANT: This is based on an RCU change that you don't have yet. I
> > think that Paul is planning on sending a pull request with that change
> > fairly soon. The code in here would compile without that fix, but it
> > would introduce a nasty regression, so, to avoid breaking bisection, I
> > based this off of the relevant change in Paul's tree. (It's the very
> > first change for 3.20 in his current queue.)
>
> Yep, should happen by early next week, if it survives this weekend's
> testing. ;-)
Ok, I'll first wait for that pull request to arrive then.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists