[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1421341986.2399.23.camel@schen9-desk2.jf.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:13:06 -0800
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@...advisors.com>,
Suruchi Kadu <suruchi.a.kadu@...el.com>,
Doug Nelson <doug.nelson@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Repost sched-rt: Reduce rq lock contention by
eliminating locking of non-feasible target
On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 20:30 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 11:01:51AM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> > Didn't get any response for this patch probably due to the holidays.
> > Reposting it as we will like to get it merged to help our database
> > workload.
> >
> > This patch added checks that prevent futile attempts to move rt tasks
> > to cpu with active tasks of equal or higher priority. This reduces
> > run queue lock contention and improves the performance of a well
> > known OLTP benchmark by 0.7%.
>
> Don't immediately see anything wrong with this, Steve?
Steve, do you have any objections to this patch? Thanks.
Tim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists