[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150115171306.GW3843@piout.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:13:06 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] ARM: at91: move the restart function to the
system timer driver
On 15/01/2015 at 18:01:34 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote :
> > Mmh, I can't clearly explain why but I have a problem with that.
> >
> > Can you explain why restart code falls in the clockevents driver ?
> >
> >
>
> That is a temporary location before getting rid of it by writing a
> proper reset driver that will use the same syscon.
>
> The main goal is to remove mach/at91_st.h and direct accesses to the
> system timer registers.
>
Just to add that it was not because of laziness but to avoid a
depending on an other subsystem...
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists