[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1421415659.11734.131.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 05:40:59 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/slub: optimize alloc/free fastpath by
removing preemption on/off
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 23:07 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 21:57:58 -0600 (CST)
> Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote:
>
> > > I get:
> > >
> > > mov %gs:0x18(%rax),%rdx
> > >
> > > Looks to me that %gs is used.
> >
> > %gs is used as a segment prefix. That does not add significant cycles.
> > Retrieving the content of %gs and loading it into another register
> > would be expensive in terms of cpu cycles.
>
> OK, maybe that's what I saw in my previous benchmarks. Again, that was
> a while ago.
I made same observation about 3 years ago, on old cpus.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists