[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150116134128.GP7091@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 13:41:28 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Alexis Berlemont <alexis.berlemont@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"msalter@...hat.com" <msalter@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"S. Lockwood-Childs" <sjl@...labs.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 00/36] perf tools: New build framework
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:43:49PM +0000, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 01:30:13PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:22:21PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:12:14PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > I just tried a cross-build for arm, and that blew up when trying to do
> > > > something with arch/arm/util/libperf-in.o (log below). I bisected that
> > > > to f169fbc4c59dd9d4 "perf build: Add arch x86 objects building". I'm
> > > > looking into why now.
> > >
> > > I get a similar failure doing a native arm64 build. I think the problem is
> > > because the arch/ files for arm and arm64 aren't always required (i.e. there
> > > are configurations where nothing is built under there) and, consequently,
> > > libperf-in.o isn't actually needed and we try to link against something that
> > > doesn't exist.
> >
> > exactly ;-) I'll spin v3 shortly..
>
> this fixes the issue for me
Same for me, thanks!
Tested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Will
> ---
> diff --git a/tools/build/Makefile.build b/tools/build/Makefile.build
> index d35b66014992..396b33b124d1 100644
> --- a/tools/build/Makefile.build
> +++ b/tools/build/Makefile.build
> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ quiet_cmd_cc_s_c = AS $@
>
> # Link agregate command
> quiet_cmd_ld_multi = LD $@
> - cmd_ld_multi = $(LD) -r -o $@ $^
> + cmd_ld_multi = $(LD) -r -o $@ $(wildcard $^)
>
> # Build rules
> $(OUTPUT)%.o: %.c FORCE
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists