[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1421670563-28228-1-git-send-email-vdavydov@parallels.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:29:23 +0300
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
CC: <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] fs: super: do not cacheline align s_{inode,dentry}_lru
super_block->s_{inode,dentry}_lru were made cacheline aligned, because
the list_lru struct had a spinlock and a list embedded to it and
therefore could be actively modified.
Today, struct list_lru is, in fact, read-only: the lists and locks live
in list_lru_node's, which list_lru points to. The list_lru_node struct
is already cacheline aligned by definition.
So let us drop the cacheline aligned annotation in order not to waste
space in struct super_block.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
---
include/linux/fs.h | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 0bd9669ce91d..790e534adbc7 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1309,12 +1309,9 @@ struct super_block {
struct workqueue_struct *s_dio_done_wq;
struct hlist_head s_pins;
- /*
- * Keep the lru lists last in the structure so they always sit on their
- * own individual cachelines.
- */
- struct list_lru s_dentry_lru ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
- struct list_lru s_inode_lru ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
+ struct list_lru s_dentry_lru;
+ struct list_lru s_inode_lru;
+
struct rcu_head rcu;
/*
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists