[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALT56yOuSV9X3m5fkjv16=7PXd8SrkKoy_TyH6DkMpQv68YaEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:37:31 +0400
From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrea Adami <andrea.adami@...il.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: sa1100: add platform functions to handle PWER settings
Hello,
2015-01-21 13:05 GMT+03:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>:
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> <dbaryshkov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > PWER settings logically belongs neither to GPIO nor to system IRQ code.
> > Add special functions to handle PWER (for GPIO and for system IRQs)
> > from platform code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>
>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/generic.c b/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/generic.c
> (...)
> > +int sa11x0_gpio_set_wake(unsigned int gpio, unsigned int on)
> (...)
> > +int sa11x0_sc_set_wake(unsigned int irq, unsigned int on)
>
> Why are these two functions not added to any .h file?
>
> Did you miss to commit something or are there compile
> warnings about this?
I thought quite a while about adding them to any header. In the end I ended
adding them to the irqchip header file. PWER handling is (a bit) related to IRQ
handling. The only other user of those functions would be a gpio (or pinctrl
if it ends that way) driver.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists