[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAVeFuJHST9VOWXe_cZNvLmfGdamuU4HSgdZC6EoQvrsGFt+Fg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:55:36 +0900
From: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
Bob Mottram <bob.mottram@...ethink.co.uk>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: tegra: Maintain CPU endianness
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 03:22:25PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> Support CPU BE mode by adding endianness conversion for memcpy interactions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>> index 28b87e6..e0d3ef1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>> @@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ static int tegra_i2c_empty_rx_fifo(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> if (rx_fifo_avail > 0 && buf_remaining > 0) {
>> BUG_ON(buf_remaining > 3);
>> val = i2c_readl(i2c_dev, I2C_RX_FIFO);
>> + val = cpu_to_le32(val);
>
> Should this not technically be le32_to_cpu() since the data originates
> from the I2C controller?
>
>> memcpy(buf, &val, buf_remaining);
>> buf_remaining = 0;
>> rx_fifo_avail--;
>> @@ -343,7 +344,9 @@ static int tegra_i2c_fill_tx_fifo(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>> */
>> if (tx_fifo_avail > 0 && buf_remaining > 0) {
>> BUG_ON(buf_remaining > 3);
>> + val = 0;
>
> Why does this have to be initialized to 0 now?
I suspect this is because we are going to memcpy less than 4 bytes
into it, but I cannot figure out how that memcpy if guaranteed to
produce the expected result for both endiannesses.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists