[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+mtBx8yeLG7UwqtknAsUTBtpocspraBcfj5W-2vTBA5pC8LEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:21:47 -0800
From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
To: Mohammad Jamal <md.jamalmohiuddin@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include:linux:Optimizations to __skb_push
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Mohammad Jamal
<md.jamalmohiuddin@...il.com> wrote:
> This patch optimizes __skb_push function
>
> Signed-off-by: Mohammad Jamal <md.jamalmohiuddin@...il.com>
> ---
> include/linux/skbuff.h | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> index 85ab7d7..9acffb2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -1671,9 +1671,8 @@ static inline unsigned char *__skb_put(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int len)
> unsigned char *skb_push(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int len);
> static inline unsigned char *__skb_push(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int len)
> {
> - skb->data -= len;
> skb->len += len;
> - return skb->data;
> + return skb->data -= len;
> }
>
Hmm, this seems less readable to me. What is the effect of this patch?
Does the compiler even produce different assembly?
Thanks,
Tom
> unsigned char *skb_pull(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int len);
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists