[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+anRV98Y_EQGvMiPvc-JUu9KxmP2SY7kYXvjVw3Dj-KQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:24:45 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Cc: Mohammad Jamal <md.jamalmohiuddin@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include:linux:Optimizations to __skb_push
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com> wrote:
> Hmm, this seems less readable to me. What is the effect of this patch?
> Does the compiler even produce different assembly?
No change at all in generated assembly, this looks not worth it.
BTW, most __skb_push() callers ignore return value.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists