[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP8vtKLzrDRWGC8y0cW5ig15p_-CyGktgY-P+kFKeBPvcpAN1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 06:34:59 +0530
From: Jamal Mohammad <md.jamalmohiuddin@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include:linux:Optimizations to __skb_push
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com> wrote:
>
>> Hmm, this seems less readable to me. What is the effect of this patch?
>> Does the compiler even produce different assembly?
>
> No change at all in generated assembly, this looks not worth it.
>
> BTW, most __skb_push() callers ignore return value.
it just reduces the number of lines....
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists