[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdU+sQCxaZsV0KthWkuPrFseqtQZb1j+Emn1CShXh4VdnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 21:35:56 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Gaurav Minocha <gaurav.minocha.os@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Add missing of_node_put() in of_find_node_by_path()
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:45:56 +0100
>> , Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>> wrote:
>>> When traversing all nodes and moving to a new path component, the old
>>> one must be released by calling of_node_put(). Else the refcounts of the
>>> parent node(s) will not be decremented.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>>> ---
> [...]
>>> Feel free to (ab)use the code below and derive a unittest from it...
>
> BTW, can you do this please? They are pretty important for core
> changes now, and I'm stuck with doing them if the person supplying a
> patch does not (and I'm already too much of a bottleneck on the DT
> code).
I'll see whether I can get to it...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists