lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 23:36:25 +0300 From: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com> To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>, Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-ocores: add common clock support On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote: > 2?) a new binding is present to specify the IP clock speed: > - is this needed? is somebody using the driver without CCF? > - if so, the new binding is parsed and evaluated > - I couldn't find an existing binding to specify a clock speed. > Please have a look, too. Otherwise we need to introduce sth > like "opencores,ip-clock-khz" probably. > - "clock-frequency" is describing the bus speed as usual ePAPR document says that clock-frequency 'specifies the frequency of a clock in Hz', not identifying which clock. Outside i2c drivers subtree it is commonly used to specify input clock frequency of IP blocks, even for bus controllers, e.g. SPI. -- Thanks. -- Max -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists