[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150122224250.GP27202@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:42:51 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/6] clk: Make clk API return per-user struct clk
instances
On 01/22, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Moves clock state to struct clk_core, but takes care to change as little API as
> possible.
>
> struct clk_hw still has a pointer to a struct clk, which is the
> implementation's per-user clk instance, for backwards compatibility.
>
> The struct clk that clk_get_parent() returns isn't owned by the caller, but by
> the clock implementation, so the former shouldn't call clk_put() on it.
>
> Because some boards in mach-omap2 still register clocks statically, their clock
> registration had to be updated to take into account that the clock information
> is stored in struct clk_core now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
>
> ---
My comment on v11 still stands about __clk_create_clk() in
clkdev.c, but otherwise I don't see problems. You can have my
reviewed-by anyway.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists