linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] CR4 handling improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1501222334390.5526@nanos>
Date:	Thu, 22 Jan 2015 23:42:49 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>,
	"hillf.zj" <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] CR4 handling improvements

On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > This looks ok I suppose, although the x86 people should pass verdict on
> > the first few patches.
> 
> Hi all-
> 
> What's the status of this series?

I've reviewed the x86 parts except for the perf stuff. So if Peter is
happy with that he should take it via perf as I expect conflicts there
rather than in the non perf areas

Thanks,

	tglx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/