linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] CR4 handling improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:37:17 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>,
	"hillf.zj" <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] CR4 handling improvements

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:42:49PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > This looks ok I suppose, although the x86 people should pass verdict on
> > > the first few patches.
> > 
> > Hi all-
> > 
> > What's the status of this series?
> 
> I've reviewed the x86 parts except for the perf stuff. So if Peter is
> happy with that he should take it via perf as I expect conflicts there
> rather than in the non perf areas

Ah indeed you did; let me queue the lot then. Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/