lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1421986385.24984.11.camel@ellerman.id.au>
Date:	Fri, 23 Jan 2015 15:13:05 +1100
From:	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:	Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
Cc:	Stewart Smith <stewart@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Vasant Hegde <hegdevasant@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
	Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Neelesh Gupta <neelegup@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC..." <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc/powernv: Skip registering log region
 when CONFIG_PRINTK=n

On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 23:03 -0500, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Stewart Smith
> <stewart@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com> writes:
> >> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 21:26 -0500, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> >>>> When CONFIG_PRINTK=n, log_buf_addr_get() returns NULL and log_buf_len_get()
> >>>> return 0. Check for these return values and skip registering the dump buffer.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
> >>>> CC: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c | 6 ++++++
> >>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> What changed since v1? I don't see anything?
> >>
> >> Nothing in this patch but there is a v2 of the first patch in this
> >> series, so had to resend this patch with a v2.

OK. You didn't send patch 1 to the this list though, so I only saw it on lkml.
Please don't do that in future.

> > You also missed my Reviewed-by :)
> 
> Sincere apologies for the oversight. Maintainers, could you please add
> this Reviewed-by tag when picking this up?
> 
> Reviewed-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

For future reference patchwork will catch these tags automatically. So if you
have forgotten to add them you can always reply to your own patch like you have
here and patchwork will detect them.

eg:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/431648/mbox/

cheers


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ