lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D0221EB9-B6B3-4860-83D6-427E3C718193@jcrosoft.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Jan 2015 15:50:13 +0800
From:	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
To:	Nicolas FERRE <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...el.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: at91: fix PM initialization for newer SoCs


> On Jan 23, 2015, at 12:07 AM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com> wrote:
> 
> Newer SoCs: at91sam9x5, at91sam9n12, sama5d3 and sama5d4 embed a DDR controller
> and have a different PMC status register layout than the at91sam9g45. Create
> another at91_sam9x5_pm_init() function to match this compatibility.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sam9.c  | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sama5.c |  2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h        |  2 ++
> arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c             |  7 +++++++
> 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sam9.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sam9.c
> index 0fe1ced608c5..c8252ddac6f0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sam9.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sam9.c
> @@ -61,3 +61,23 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(at91sam9g45_dt, "Atmel AT91SAM9G45")
> 	.init_machine	= sam9g45_dt_device_init,
> 	.dt_compat	= at91_9g45_board_compat,
> MACHINE_END
> +
> +static void __init sam9x5_dt_device_init(void)
> +{
> +	at91_sam9x5_pm_init();
> +	of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static const char *at91_9x5_board_compat[] __initconst = {
> +	"atmel,at91sam9x5",
> +	"atmel,at91sam9n12",
> +	NULL
> +};
> +
> +DT_MACHINE_START(at91sam9x5_dt, "Atmel AT91SAM9”)
sam9? sam9x5
> +	/* Maintainer: Atmel */
> +	.map_io		= at91_map_io,
> +	.init_early	= at91_dt_initialize,
> +	.init_machine	= sam9x5_dt_device_init,
> +	.dt_compat	= at91_9x5_board_compat,
> +MACHINE_END

why a second START instead of a pdata?

and create a second dt compatible
e
Best Regards,
J.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sama5.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sama5.c
> index 44d372a22a29..b7338966c8ab 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sama5.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sama5.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
> 
> static void __init sama5_dt_device_init(void)
> {
> -	at91_sam9260_pm_init();
> +	at91_sam9x5_pm_init();
> 	of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
> }
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h b/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h
> index 1e60faec2eba..709570cbef2b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h
> @@ -32,10 +32,12 @@ extern void at91sam9_idle(void);
> extern void __init at91_rm9200_pm_init(void);
> extern void __init at91_sam9260_pm_init(void);
> extern void __init at91_sam9g45_pm_init(void);
> +extern void __init at91_sam9x5_pm_init(void);
> #else
> void __init at91_rm9200_pm_init(void) { }
> void __init at91_sam9260_pm_init(void) { }
> void __init at91_sam9g45_pm_init(void) { }
> +void __init at91_sam9x5_pm_init(void) { }
> #endif
> 
> #endif /* _AT91_GENERIC_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> index 81f2f12d3cc1..87c1fd8aa1b6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> @@ -306,3 +306,10 @@ void __init at91_sam9g45_pm_init(void)
> 	at91_pm_data.memctrl = AT91_MEMCTRL_DDRSDR;
> 	return at91_pm_init();
> }
> +
> +void __init at91_sam9x5_pm_init(void)
> +{
> +	at91_pm_data.uhp_udp_mask = AT91SAM926x_PMC_UHP | AT91SAM926x_PMC_UDP;
> +	at91_pm_data.memctrl = AT91_MEMCTRL_DDRSDR;
> +	return at91_pm_init();
> +}
> -- 
> 2.1.3
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ