linux-kernel - [PATCH] ix86: log unhandled signals from do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <54C210DB02000078000588E3@mail.emea.novell.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Jan 2015 08:14:03 +0000
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:	<mingo@...e.hu>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ix86: log unhandled signals from do_trap() just like
 x86-64 does

There not being a similar difference in page fault handling, I can't
see why 32- and 64-bit should differ in behavior here.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c |    2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

--- 3.19-rc5/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ 3.19-rc5-ix86-show-unhandled-signals/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@ -190,7 +190,6 @@ do_trap(int trapnr, int signr, char *str
 	tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
 	tsk->thread.trap_nr = trapnr;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	if (show_unhandled_signals && unhandled_signal(tsk, signr) &&
 	    printk_ratelimit()) {
 		pr_info("%s[%d] trap %s ip:%lx sp:%lx error:%lx",
@@ -199,7 +198,6 @@ do_trap(int trapnr, int signr, char *str
 		print_vma_addr(" in ", regs->ip);
 		pr_cont("\n");
 	}
-#endif
 
 	force_sig_info(signr, info ?: SEND_SIG_PRIV, tsk);
 }



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/