[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150123093246.GK1850@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:32:46 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: wsa@...-dreams.de, jdelvare@...e.de, arnd@...db.de,
maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com, dianders@...omium.org,
u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com,
boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com, maxime.coquelin@...com,
andrew@...n.ch, sjg@...omium.org, markus.mayer@...aro.org,
ch.naveen@...sung.com, jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com,
max.schwarz@...ine.de, skuribay@...ox.com,
Romain.Baeriswyl@...lis.com, wenkai.du@...el.com,
christian.ruppert@...lis.com, alan@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] i2c-designware: Add Intel Baytrail PMIC I2C bus
support
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:48:51PM -0800, David E. Box wrote:
> > It would be nice if it was possible to compile this as a module.
>
> In the makefile the driver is now part of the composite object for
> I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM. So if selected it will compile as the platform driver
> is compiled. This makes the most sense since the linking doesn't work right if
> both drivers aren't built the same. This is really an extension to the platform
> driver anyway and not standalone code.
Makes sense. Thanks for the explanation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists