[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150123141853.GA9592@katana>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 15:18:53 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: jdelvare@...e.de, arnd@...db.de, maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com,
dianders@...omium.org, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com,
boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com, maxime.coquelin@...com,
andrew@...n.ch, sjg@...omium.org, markus.mayer@...aro.org,
ch.naveen@...sung.com, jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com,
max.schwarz@...ine.de, mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com,
skuribay@...ox.com, Romain.Baeriswyl@...lis.com,
wenkai.du@...el.com, christian.ruppert@...lis.com,
alan@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] i2c-designware: Add Intel Baytrail PMIC I2C bus
support
Mostly good, except one thing:
> +config I2C_DESIGNWARE_BAYTRAIL
> + bool "Intel Baytrail I2C semaphore support"
> + depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM
> + select IOSF_MBI
This needs some dependency on something Baytrail specific. Otherwise, it
causes lots of build errors:
With ARM allnoconfig, I can select this option but there are no headers
for iosf.
With x86_64_defconfig and disabled ACPI, I can select this option but it
fails over "implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_evaluate_integer’".
An incremental patch will do for me, the rest looks good.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists