lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150123003652.GD16473@jaegeuk-mac02>
Date:	Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:36:52 -0800
From:	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To:	Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
Cc:	Changman Lee <cm224.lee@...sung.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev][RFC PATCH 04/10] f2fs: introduce universal
 lookup/update interface for extent cache

Hi Chao,

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 03:12:13PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> In this patch, we do these jobs:
> 1. rename {check,update}_extent_cache to f2fs_{lookup,update}_extent_info;
> 2. introduce universal lookup/update interface of extent cache:
> f2fs_{lookup,update}_extent_cache including above two real functions, then
> export them to function callers.
> 
> So after above cleanup, we can add new rb-tree based extent cache into exported
> interfaces.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/data.c     | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h     |  2 +-
>  fs/f2fs/file.c     |  2 +-
>  fs/f2fs/inline.c   |  2 +-
>  fs/f2fs/recovery.c |  2 +-
>  5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 5a3e489..4f5b871e 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -270,20 +270,20 @@ static void f2fs_map_bh(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t pgofs,
>  		bh_result->b_size = UINT_MAX;
>  }
>  
> -static int check_extent_cache(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t pgofs,
> -					struct extent_info *ei)
> +static bool f2fs_lookup_extent_info(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t pgofs,
> +							struct extent_info *ei)

This is a static function, so I think it would be good to remove "f2fs_".

>  {
>  	struct f2fs_inode_info *fi = F2FS_I(inode);
>  	pgoff_t start_fofs, end_fofs;
>  	block_t start_blkaddr;
>  
>  	if (is_inode_flag_set(fi, FI_NO_EXTENT))
> -		return 0;
> +		return false;
>  
>  	read_lock(&fi->ext_lock);
>  	if (fi->ext.len == 0) {
>  		read_unlock(&fi->ext_lock);
> -		return 0;
> +		return false;
>  	}
>  
>  	stat_inc_total_hit(inode->i_sb);
> @@ -296,29 +296,22 @@ static int check_extent_cache(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t pgofs,
>  		*ei = fi->ext;
>  		stat_inc_read_hit(inode->i_sb);
>  		read_unlock(&fi->ext_lock);
> -		return 1;
> +		return true;
>  	}
>  	read_unlock(&fi->ext_lock);
> -	return 0;
> +	return false;
>  }
>  
> -void update_extent_cache(struct dnode_of_data *dn)
> +static bool f2fs_update_extent_info(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t fofs,
> +								block_t blkaddr)

Ditto.

Thanks,

>  {
> -	struct f2fs_inode_info *fi = F2FS_I(dn->inode);
> -	pgoff_t fofs, start_fofs, end_fofs;
> +	struct f2fs_inode_info *fi = F2FS_I(inode);
> +	pgoff_t start_fofs, end_fofs;
>  	block_t start_blkaddr, end_blkaddr;
>  	int need_update = true;
>  
> -	f2fs_bug_on(F2FS_I_SB(dn->inode), dn->data_blkaddr == NEW_ADDR);
> -
> -	/* Update the page address in the parent node */
> -	__set_data_blkaddr(dn);
> -
>  	if (is_inode_flag_set(fi, FI_NO_EXTENT))
> -		return;
> -
> -	fofs = start_bidx_of_node(ofs_of_node(dn->node_page), fi) +
> -							dn->ofs_in_node;
> +		return false;
>  
>  	write_lock(&fi->ext_lock);
>  
> @@ -333,16 +326,16 @@ void update_extent_cache(struct dnode_of_data *dn)
>  
>  	/* Initial extent */
>  	if (fi->ext.len == 0) {
> -		if (dn->data_blkaddr != NULL_ADDR) {
> +		if (blkaddr != NULL_ADDR) {
>  			fi->ext.fofs = fofs;
> -			fi->ext.blk = dn->data_blkaddr;
> +			fi->ext.blk = blkaddr;
>  			fi->ext.len = 1;
>  		}
>  		goto end_update;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Front merge */
> -	if (fofs == start_fofs - 1 && dn->data_blkaddr == start_blkaddr - 1) {
> +	if (fofs == start_fofs - 1 && blkaddr == start_blkaddr - 1) {
>  		fi->ext.fofs--;
>  		fi->ext.blk--;
>  		fi->ext.len++;
> @@ -350,7 +343,7 @@ void update_extent_cache(struct dnode_of_data *dn)
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Back merge */
> -	if (fofs == end_fofs + 1 && dn->data_blkaddr == end_blkaddr + 1) {
> +	if (fofs == end_fofs + 1 && blkaddr == end_blkaddr + 1) {
>  		fi->ext.len++;
>  		goto end_update;
>  	}
> @@ -377,9 +370,30 @@ void update_extent_cache(struct dnode_of_data *dn)
>  	}
>  end_update:
>  	write_unlock(&fi->ext_lock);
> -	if (need_update)
> +	return need_update;
> +}
> +
> +static bool f2fs_lookup_extent_cache(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t pgofs,
> +							struct extent_info *ei)
> +{
> +	return f2fs_lookup_extent_info(inode, pgofs, ei);
> +}
> +
> +void f2fs_update_extent_cache(struct dnode_of_data *dn)
> +{
> +	struct f2fs_inode_info *fi = F2FS_I(dn->inode);
> +	pgoff_t fofs;
> +
> +	f2fs_bug_on(F2FS_I_SB(dn->inode), dn->data_blkaddr == NEW_ADDR);
> +
> +	/* Update the page address in the parent node */
> +	__set_data_blkaddr(dn);
> +
> +	fofs = start_bidx_of_node(ofs_of_node(dn->node_page), fi) +
> +							dn->ofs_in_node;
> +
> +	if (f2fs_update_extent_info(dn->inode, fofs, dn->data_blkaddr))
>  		sync_inode_page(dn);
> -	return;
>  }
>  
>  struct page *find_data_page(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index, bool sync)
> @@ -625,7 +639,7 @@ static int __get_data_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
>  	/* Get the page offset from the block offset(iblock) */
>  	pgofs =	(pgoff_t)(iblock >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - blkbits));
>  
> -	if (check_extent_cache(inode, pgofs, &ei)) {
> +	if (f2fs_lookup_extent_cache(inode, pgofs, &ei)) {
>  		f2fs_map_bh(inode, pgofs, &ei, bh_result);
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> @@ -792,7 +806,7 @@ int do_write_data_page(struct page *page, struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>  		set_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_UPDATE_WRITE);
>  	} else {
>  		write_data_page(page, &dn, fio);
> -		update_extent_cache(&dn);
> +		f2fs_update_extent_cache(&dn);
>  		set_inode_flag(F2FS_I(inode), FI_APPEND_WRITE);
>  	}
>  out_writepage:
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index a74ad85..eb9ffae 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ void f2fs_submit_page_mbio(struct f2fs_sb_info *, struct page *,
>  						struct f2fs_io_info *);
>  int reserve_new_block(struct dnode_of_data *);
>  int f2fs_reserve_block(struct dnode_of_data *, pgoff_t);
> -void update_extent_cache(struct dnode_of_data *);
> +void f2fs_update_extent_cache(struct dnode_of_data *);
>  struct page *find_data_page(struct inode *, pgoff_t, bool);
>  struct page *get_lock_data_page(struct inode *, pgoff_t);
>  struct page *get_new_data_page(struct inode *, struct page *, pgoff_t, bool);
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> index 5df3367..0dcd9fb 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ int truncate_data_blocks_range(struct dnode_of_data *dn, int count)
>  			continue;
>  
>  		dn->data_blkaddr = NULL_ADDR;
> -		update_extent_cache(dn);
> +		f2fs_update_extent_cache(dn);
>  		invalidate_blocks(sbi, blkaddr);
>  		nr_free++;
>  	}
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inline.c b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> index fa2aa2f..9f6c745 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ no_update:
>  	set_page_writeback(page);
>  	fio.blk_addr = dn->data_blkaddr;
>  	write_data_page(page, dn, &fio);
> -	update_extent_cache(dn);
> +	f2fs_update_extent_cache(dn);
>  	f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback(page, DATA);
>  	if (dirty)
>  		inode_dec_dirty_pages(dn->inode);
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> index c4211a5..a7adbdb 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static int do_recover_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode,
>  			/* write dummy data page */
>  			recover_data_page(sbi, NULL, &sum, src, dest);
>  			dn.data_blkaddr = dest;
> -			update_extent_cache(&dn);
> +			f2fs_update_extent_cache(&dn);
>  			recovered++;
>  		}
>  		dn.ofs_in_node++;
> -- 
> 2.2.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ