[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1756449.aIckN0M451@dtor-glaptop>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:37:02 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jslaby@...e.cz,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>, rpurdie@...ys.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Evan Broder <evan@...oder.net>,
Arnaud Patard <arnaud.patard@...-net.org>,
Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Niels de Vos <devos@...oraproject.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, blogic@...nwrt.org,
Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 2/2] INPUT: Introduce generic trigger/LED pairs to input LEDs
On Friday, January 23, 2015 01:30:11 AM Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le Fri 23 Jan 2015 01:10:38 +0100, a écrit :
> > Dmitry Torokhov, le Sun 04 Jan 2015 15:28:38 -0800, a écrit :
> > > > + dev = cdev->dev->platform_data;
> > >
> > > Umm, platform data is not the best place for storing this. Why not
> > > drvdata?
> >
> > Ah, actually led_classdev already makes use of it, see the
> > device_create_with_groups call in led_classdev_register.
>
> Actually I'd say it makes sense to be using the platform_data field:
> from the point of view of the led object, the input object is indeed
> something like a platform.
No, platform data is what difefrentiates an arm board from another arm board,
or an x86 or mips one.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists