[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1501241814430.5526@nanos>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 18:15:23 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
cc: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] irqchip: gic: Allow interrupt level to be set for
PPIs.
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20 2015 at 4:52:59 pm GMT, Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com> wrote:
> > During a recent cleanup of the arm64 DTs it has become clear that
> > the handling of PPIs in xxxx_set_type() is incorrect. The ARM TRMs
> > for GICv2 and later allow for "implementation defined" support for
> > setting the edge or level type of the PPI interrupts and don't restrict
> > the activation level of the signal. Current ARM implementations
> > do restrict the PPI level type to IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW, but licensees
> > of the IP can decide to shoot themselves in the foot at any time.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
>
> For the GIC and GICv3 parts:
>
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
So I queue that if there are no further objections from Russell or the
DT folks.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists