[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150124182000.59a4a96b@bbrezillon>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 18:20:00 +0100
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] ARM: at91: fix irq_pm_install_action WARNING
Hi Thomas,
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 17:37:48 +0100 (CET)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > - change the compatible string to clearly show that this chip is purely
> > virtual
>
> So we probably want to do : s/dumb/virt/ for both DT and code to make
> it clear from the names as well.
I thought the dumb word was denoting the simplicity (stupidity ?) of
the irq demultiplexer, but indeed, I don't see how a virtual irq demuxer
could have enough information to do a better job (if there's an
interrupt cause register, then it's not a virtual/software demuxer
anymore).
So replacing dumb by virt or virtual makes sense here.
Best Regards,
Boris
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists