[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150126100955.GA18907@gradator.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:09:55 +0100
From: Sylvain Rochet <sylvain.rochet@...secur.com>
To: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...el.com>
Cc: nicolas.ferre@...el.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com, peda@...ntia.se
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] pm: at91: the standby mode uses the same sram
function as the suspend to memory mode
Hello Wenyou,
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 05:42:11PM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote:
> +static int at91_pm_verify_clocks(suspend_state_t state)
> {
> unsigned long scsr;
> int i;
>
> + /* For PM_SUSPEND_STANDBY, skip verifying the clock */
> + if (state == PM_SUSPEND_STANDBY)
> + return 1;
> +
In my opinion we should use the select() already in place in
at91_pm_enter() to do that:
> static int at91_pm_enter(suspend_state_t state)
> {
> at91_pinctrl_gpio_suspend();
>
> switch (state) {
(...)
> + case PM_SUSPEND_MEM:
/*
* Ensure that clocks are in a valid state.
*/
if (!at91_pm_verify_clocks())
goto error;
/* FALLTHROUGH */
> + case PM_SUSPEND_STANDBY:
> /*
> - * Suspend-to-RAM is like STANDBY plus slow clock mode, so
Sylvain
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists