linux-kernel - RE: Change behaviour when tracing ... nasty trap (was Re: [PATCH] PM/Trace: get rid of synchronous resume limit during PM trace)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <27240C0AC20F114CBF8149A2696CBE4A01F1AD6A@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:39:04 +0000
From:	"Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	"Fu, Zhonghui" <zhonghui.fu@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Change behaviour when tracing ... nasty trap (was Re: [PATCH]
 PM/Trace: get rid of synchronous resume limit during PM trace)

Hello Pavel,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pavel Machek [mailto:pavel@....cz]
> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 6:24 PM
> To: Fu, Zhonghui
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki; Brown, Len; Greg Kroah-Hartman;
> linux-pm@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Liu, Chuansheng
> Subject: Change behaviour when tracing ... nasty trap (was Re: [PATCH]
> PM/Trace: get rid of synchronous resume limit during PM trace)
> 
> On Mon 2015-01-26 13:07:03, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
> > >From f9c841d1f943d81b5ab0aac7483e794a7f966296 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> 2001
> > From: Zhonghui Fu <zhonghui.fu@...ux.intel.com>
> > Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:27:08 +0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] PM/Trace: get rid of synchronous resume limit during PM
> trace
> >
> > There are some kind of dependency between devices in some
> > hardware platforms. So, asynchronous resuming devices may
> > hang system due to wrong resume order. As a result, should
> > not fore synchronously resuming devices during tracing
> > PM events.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu <zhonghui.fu@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/base/power/main.c    |    3 +--
> >  include/linux/resume-trace.h |    7 -------
> >  2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
> > index 9717d5f..5df148b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
> > @@ -517,8 +517,7 @@ static int device_resume_noirq(struct device *dev,
> pm_message_t state, bool asyn
> >
> >  static bool is_async(struct device *dev)
> >  {
> > -	return dev->power.async_suspend && pm_async_enabled
> > -		&& !pm_trace_is_enabled();
> > +	return dev->power.async_suspend && pm_async_enabled;
> >  }
> >
> 
> Actually... whoever did the original patch was evil person. Changing
> behaviour when tracing is requested is evil, evil, evil. Git blame
> tells me
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
> 
> went to the dark side.

Although I didn't get where is something wrong, but the is_async() is not created by my commit,
it is from commit (PM: Start asynchronous resume threads upfront), I just moved it ahead.

And like other phases, I added it into resum/suspend_noirq()...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/