[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54C6F409.2030206@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:12:25 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
CC: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Lunxue Dai <lunxue.dai@...k-chips.com>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...era.com>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] watchdog: dw_wdt: pat the watchdog before enabling
it
On 01/26/2015 03:27 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On some dw_wdt implementations the "top" register may be initted to 0
> at bootup. In such a case, each "pat" of the watchdog will reset the
> timer to 0xffff. That's pretty short.
>
> The input clock of the wdt can be any of a wide range of values. On
> an rk3288 system, I've seen the wdt clock be 24.75 MHz. That means
> each tick is ~40ns and we'll count to 0xffff in ~2.6ms.
>
> Because of the above two facts, it's a really good idea to pat the
> watchdog after initting the "top" register properly and before
> enabling the watchdog. If you don't then there's no way we'll get the
> next heartbeat in time.
>
> Jisheng Zhang fixed this problem on some dw_mmc versions by using the
> TOP_INIT feature. However, the dw_wdt on rk3288 doesn't have TOP_INIT
> so it's a good idea to also pat the watchdog manually.
>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists