linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: re-fromat AT91 part to match other entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150127021344.GA22154@quad.lixom.net>
Date:	Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:13:44 -0800
From:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	ARM Maintainers <arm@...nel.org>,
	Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: re-fromat AT91 part to match other entries

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 04:45:02PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Le 14/01/2015 10:05, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> > On Wednesday 14 January 2015 00:47:59 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> >>
> >> On 13/01/2015 at 15:09:56 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote :
> >>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 03:43:00PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> >>>> The entries are separated as ARM V4/V5 and ARM V7 as some other per-SoC config
> >>>> options may be removed in the near future.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> Hi Olof,
> >>>>
> >>>> This is an attempt to match other ARM SoC families format.
> >>>> If you feel that the patch can be good, do not hesitate to take it yourself. I
> >>>> don't plan to integrate it in any of my pull-request so it can appear quickly in
> >>>> arm-soc and can be used by everyone.
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> If you see what Peter did, he split up the rules per-SoC based on how
> >>> things were selectable in Kconfig. Since you seem to have the Kconfig
> >>> entries already, how about doing the same? That way the same information
> >>> w.r.t. SoC family that you have as comments isn't lost either.
> >>>
> >>
> >> You didn't see the patch set yet because it depends on a lot of other
> >> series still being discussed but after the switch to multiplatform, the
> >> only config option left will be SOC_AT91RM9200, SOC_AT91SAM9 (both
> >> under SOC_SAM_V4_V5) and SOC_SAMA5, under SOC_SAM_V7.
> >>
> >> That's our plan, unless you feel that we should keep one config option
> >> per SoC.
> > 
> > With the patches that I prepared last year, all of AT91SAM9 becomes
> > one small file, so there really isn't any need to have separate Kconfig
> > options.
> 
> Hi Olof,
> 
> After what noted Alexandre and Arnd, don't you think my initial attempt
> was okay? Aka: ping ;-)

Ah, yes. Applied now.


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/