linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] blk-mq: one revert and one blk-mq kobject fix candidate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54CA6050.20705@fb.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 Jan 2015 08:31:12 -0800
From:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
To:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] blk-mq: one revert and one blk-mq kobject fix candidate

On 01/29/2015 04:17 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> The 1st patch reverts commit "blk-mq: fix hctx/ctx kobject use-after-free"
> (commit 76d697d10769048e) which is wrong and causes scsi regression.
>
> The 2nd patch is another candidate/approach for fixing hctx/ctx kobject
> use-after-free.
>
> Sorry for causing the mess, and I am happy to see it fixed by either
> Bart Van Assche's fix or this patchset, or other better one.

Thanks Ming, this looks better...

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/