[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACzj_yXN5EAHzy_RfYbjgD2a8e4trJ-j78R4vU3Q6+6KbAm=Vw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:19:03 +0800
From: Wincy Van <fanwenyi0529@...il.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: "gleb@...nel.org" <gleb@...nel.org>,
"Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@...el.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: nVMX: Enable nested virtualize x2apic mode.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > No need for this function and nested_cpu_has_virt_x2apic_mode. Just
>>> > inline them in their caller(s). Same for other cases throughout the series.
>>> >
>> Do you mean that we should also inline the same functions in the other
>> patches of this patch set?
>> I think these functions will keep the code tidy, just like the
>> functions as nested_cpu_has_preemption_timer, nested_cpu_has_ept, etc.
>
> Most of the functions are just used once. If you want to keep them,
> please place them all close to the existing ones.
>
Yep, I will inline the functions like nested_vmx_check_virt_x2apic and keep
the nested_cpu_has series.
Thanks,
Wincy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists