lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1422461105-815-1-git-send-email-johan@kernel.org>
Date:	Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:05:05 +0100
From:	Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>,
	Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] gpio: sysfs: fix gpio device-attribute leak

commit 0915e6feb38de8d3601819992a5bd050201a56fa upstream.

The gpio device attributes were never destroyed when the gpio was
unexported (or on export failures).

Use device_create_with_groups() to create the default device attributes
of the gpio class device. Note that this also fixes the
attribute-creation race with userspace for these attributes.

Remove contingent attributes in export error path and on unexport.

Fixes: d8f388d8dc8d ("gpio: sysfs interface")
Cc: stable <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v2.6.27+
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
---

Backport to v3.10 (and earlier) which lacks device_create_with_groups().

Changes since v1
 - fix mistake in backport, which removed the attributes while holding
   the mutex in gpiod_unexport (reported by Luis Henriques)


 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index bc3d59efe80b..4ff40cf14910 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ static ssize_t gpio_value_store(struct device *dev,
 	return status;
 }
 
-static const DEVICE_ATTR(value, 0644,
+static DEVICE_ATTR(value, 0644,
 		gpio_value_show, gpio_value_store);
 
 static irqreturn_t gpio_sysfs_irq(int irq, void *priv)
@@ -580,17 +580,17 @@ static ssize_t gpio_active_low_store(struct device *dev,
 	return status ? : size;
 }
 
-static const DEVICE_ATTR(active_low, 0644,
+static DEVICE_ATTR(active_low, 0644,
 		gpio_active_low_show, gpio_active_low_store);
 
-static const struct attribute *gpio_attrs[] = {
+static struct attribute *gpio_attrs[] = {
 	&dev_attr_value.attr,
 	&dev_attr_active_low.attr,
 	NULL,
 };
 
 static const struct attribute_group gpio_attr_group = {
-	.attrs = (struct attribute **) gpio_attrs,
+	.attrs = gpio_attrs,
 };
 
 /*
@@ -806,20 +806,24 @@ static int gpiod_export(struct gpio_desc *desc, bool direction_may_change)
 	if (direction_may_change) {
 		status = device_create_file(dev, &dev_attr_direction);
 		if (status)
-			goto fail_unregister_device;
+			goto fail_remove_attr_group;
 	}
 
 	if (gpiod_to_irq(desc) >= 0 && (direction_may_change ||
 				       !test_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, &desc->flags))) {
 		status = device_create_file(dev, &dev_attr_edge);
 		if (status)
-			goto fail_unregister_device;
+			goto fail_remove_attr_direction;
 	}
 
 	set_bit(FLAG_EXPORT, &desc->flags);
 	mutex_unlock(&sysfs_lock);
 	return 0;
 
+fail_remove_attr_direction:
+	device_remove_file(dev, &dev_attr_direction);
+fail_remove_attr_group:
+	sysfs_remove_group(&dev->kobj, &gpio_attr_group);
 fail_unregister_device:
 	device_unregister(dev);
 fail_unlock:
@@ -971,6 +975,9 @@ static void gpiod_unexport(struct gpio_desc *desc)
 	mutex_unlock(&sysfs_lock);
 
 	if (dev) {
+		device_remove_file(dev, &dev_attr_edge);
+		device_remove_file(dev, &dev_attr_direction);
+		sysfs_remove_group(&dev->kobj, &gpio_attr_group);
 		device_unregister(dev);
 		put_device(dev);
 	}
-- 
2.0.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ