[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150128155044.GJ23038@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:50:44 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched: Pull preemption disablement to __schedule()
caller
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 01:24:11AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -2760,7 +2760,6 @@ static void __sched __schedule(void)
> struct rq *rq;
> int cpu;
>
> - preempt_disable();
Implies barrier();
> cpu = smp_processor_id();
> rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> rcu_note_context_switch();
> @@ -2822,8 +2821,6 @@ static void __sched __schedule(void)
> raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
>
> post_schedule(rq);
implies barrier();
> -
> - sched_preempt_enable_no_resched();
> }
>
> static inline void sched_submit_work(struct task_struct *tsk)
> @@ -2883,9 +2882,9 @@ void __sched schedule_preempt_disabled(void)
> static void preempt_schedule_common(void)
> {
> do {
> - preempt_count_add(PREEMPT_ACTIVE);
> + preempt_count_add(PREEMPT_ACTIVE + PREEMPT_CHECK_OFFSET);
Does _NOT_ imply barrier();
> __schedule();
> - preempt_count_sub(PREEMPT_ACTIVE);
idem.
> + preempt_count_sub(PREEMPT_ACTIVE + PREEMPT_CHECK_OFFSET);
>
> /*
> * Check again in case we missed a preemption opportunity
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists