[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150128154230.GH23038@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:42:30 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] sched: Use traced preempt count operations to
toggle PREEMPT_ACTIVE
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 01:24:10AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> d1f74e20b5b064a130cd0743a256c2d3cfe84010 turned PREEMPT_ACTIVE modifiers
> to use raw untraced preempt count operations. Meanwhile this prevents
> from debugging and tracing preemption disabled if we pull that
> responsibility to schedule() callers (see following patches).
>
Why do you care anyhow? The trace format has the preempt count in, so
any change is obvious.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists