[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150130134922.GB6188@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:49:22 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf test: Fix dso cache testcase
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:33:27AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> The current dso cache permits to keep dso->data.fd is open under a
> half of open file limit. But test__dso_data_cache() sets dso_cnt to
> limit / 2 + 1 so it'll reach the limit in the loop even though the
> loop count is one less than the dso_cnt and it makes the final
> dso__data_fd() after the loop meaningless.
>
> I guess the intention was dsos[0]->data.fd is open before the last
> open and gets closed after it. So add an assert before the last open.
>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
thanks,
jirka
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/dso-data.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/dso-data.c b/tools/perf/tests/dso-data.c
> index caaf37f079b1..22a8c428283a 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/dso-data.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/dso-data.c
> @@ -243,8 +243,8 @@ int test__dso_data_cache(void)
> limit = nr * 4;
> TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to set file limit", !set_fd_limit(limit));
>
> - /* and this is now our dso open FDs limit + 1 extra */
> - dso_cnt = limit / 2 + 1;
> + /* and this is now our dso open FDs limit */
> + dso_cnt = limit / 2;
> TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to create dsos\n",
> !dsos__create(dso_cnt, TEST_FILE_SIZE));
>
> @@ -268,7 +268,10 @@ int test__dso_data_cache(void)
> }
> }
>
> - /* open +1 dso over the allowed limit */
> + /* verify the first one is already open */
> + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("dsos[0] is not open", dsos[0]->data.fd != -1);
> +
> + /* open +1 dso to reach the allowed limit */
> fd = dso__data_fd(dsos[i], &machine);
> TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to get fd", fd > 0);
>
> --
> 2.2.2
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists