[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1422635852-21569-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:37:32 +0000
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, catalin.marinas@....com,
rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm/mm: fix compiler warning in pmdp_invalidate() (in -next)
Commit ff61d185f4e7 ("mm: convert p[te|md]_mknonnuma and remaining
page table manipulations") removed a check in
mm/pgtable-generic.c:pmdp_invalidate(), which leaves the
pmd_mknotpresent macro the only user of the entry variable.
For ARM/LPAE we use a constant 0 without referencing the argument to
mark this condition, so the entry variable is no longer used here:
mm/pgtable-generic.c: In function 'pmdp_invalidate':
mm/pgtable-generic.c:195:8: warning: unused variable 'entry' [-Wunused-variable]
pmd_t entry = *pmdp;
^
Replace the ARM macro implementation with a static inline function to
get rid of this warning.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
---
Hi Andrew,
Mel mentioned that I should send that simple fix below to you to
merge it with his original mmotm patch:
mm-convert-p_mknonnuma-and-remaining-page-table-manipulations.patch
The commit message above contains the mmotm-reference to this patch,
which will break when it hits mainline.
Can you consider this? Given that's only a warning fix I am also
happy with resending it after -rc1, if you reckon that this arch/arm
change should not go via mmotm.
On 30/01/15 10:06, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Patch looks fine to me but this is against a mmotm patch that is
> included in mmotm. The commit ID is not going to last. This should be
> sent to Andrew Morton with a note saying it's a fix to the mmotm patch
> mm-convert-p_mknonnuma-and-remaining-page-table-manipulations.patch .
> He'll then fold your fix into the original patch so that bisection works
> correctly when merged to mainline. Do you mind doing that please?
Cheers,
Andre
arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
index 370684d..0e51fbe 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
@@ -259,7 +259,10 @@ PMD_BIT_FUNC(mkyoung, |= PMD_SECT_AF);
#define mk_pmd(page,prot) pfn_pmd(page_to_pfn(page),prot)
/* represent a notpresent pmd by zero, this is used by pmdp_invalidate */
-#define pmd_mknotpresent(pmd) (__pmd(0))
+static inline pmd_t pmd_mknotpresent(pmd_t pmd)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
static inline pmd_t pmd_modify(pmd_t pmd, pgprot_t newprot)
{
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists