[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOLZvyEVQmqg9Jn5Kt_2m5K0-taJcGf6mweK4T=fwKOwn-Ovxg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 15:40:45 +0100
From: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Bo Shen <voice.shen@...el.com>,
Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...glemail.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
Richard Purdie <richard@...nedhand.com>,
patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ASoC: wm8731: let codec to manage clock by itself
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 08:54:57AM +0100, Manuel Lauss wrote:
>
>> + wm8731->mclk = devm_clk_get(&spi->dev, "mclk");
>> + if (IS_ERR(wm8731->mclk)) {
>> + wm8731->mclk = NULL;
>> + dev_warn(&spi->dev, "assuming static MCLK\n");
>> + }
>
> This is broken for both deferred probe and in the case where the clock
> API genuinely returns a NULL clock. Other than that it's the kind of
> thing that we've done for some other drivers, though it's not good to
> have to do this. Check them for correct behaviour.
Hm, so the only option is to create the simples possible 12MHz clk object?
Manuel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists