linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/raid6: correctly check for assembler capabilities

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 03 Feb 2015 22:03:35 +0100
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
	Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
	tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, james.t.kukunas@...ux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/raid6: correctly check for assembler capabilities

On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 07:50 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> Actually the prefix of this macro is "CONFIG_AS_", not "CONFIG_" :-)
> CONFIG_AS_ is reserved for assembly magic, and is never used by the the
> kconfig system.
> 
> (Well..... I might have made bits of that up, but "git grep 'config AS_'"
> doesn't find anything).

That's correct, there are no Kconfig symbols starting with AS_. But
still, I would like to hear whether there's a reasonable chance I might
convince other people to adopt my peeve.

The thinking behind that peeve is, basically, that where people
encounter a CONFIG_* macro they should only have to check the .config
file to see how that macro was evaluated in the build that was used.

Thanks,


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/