linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] WIP: Add syscall unlinkat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 04 Feb 2015 17:12:52 +0100
From:	Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
To:	Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
CC:	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] WIP: Add syscall unlinkat_s (currently x86* only)

Am 04.02.2015 um 15:52 schrieb Lukáš Czerner:
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Alexander Holler wrote:

>> I'm happy for all the feedback. But it doesn't help me. I'm not going to spend
>> the necessary time unpaid.
> 
> Right, you'd much rather have someone else to spend the time on your
> request unpaid. That's understandable, but unreasonable. You want
> it, implement it, or pay someone else to do it for you.

Maybe you should attach a big fat red warning to the kernels bugzilla
that filing a bug means either to fix it yourself or pay somone to do that.

I've never demanded that someone else fixes it.

I've just explained a problem.

Unbelievable how someone could do such without paying someone else to
fix it or by fixing it themself ...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/