[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1502041724180.26766@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:25:31 +0100 (CET)
From: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] WIP: Add syscall unlinkat_s (currently x86* only)
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 17:12:52 +0100
> From: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
> To: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
> Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
> Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
> Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
> Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] WIP: Add syscall unlinkat_s (currently x86* only)
>
> Am 04.02.2015 um 15:52 schrieb Lukáš Czerner:
> > On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Alexander Holler wrote:
>
> >> I'm happy for all the feedback. But it doesn't help me. I'm not going to spend
> >> the necessary time unpaid.
> >
> > Right, you'd much rather have someone else to spend the time on your
> > request unpaid. That's understandable, but unreasonable. You want
> > it, implement it, or pay someone else to do it for you.
>
> Maybe you should attach a big fat red warning to the kernels bugzilla
> that filing a bug means either to fix it yourself or pay somone to do that.
>
> I've never demanded that someone else fixes it.
>
> I've just explained a problem.
>
> Unbelievable how someone could do such without paying someone else to
> fix it or by fixing it themself ...
It's not a bug, you're requesting a feature.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists