[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150205200639.GA16729@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 12:06:39 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>,
"Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
OSUOSL Drivers <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>, HPDD-discuss@...1.01.org,
Andreas Ruprecht <rupran@...server.de>
Subject: Re: use of opaque subject lines
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 08:32:13PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 09:57 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > And _NEVER_ have automated scripts create patches and send them out. I
> > only know of ONE person/bot that gets away with this, and you are not
> > that person, sorry. It it not a script on the receiving end of your
> > output, so don't use a script to create a mess for them to dig through.
>
> Mind if I ask which person/bot you have in mind?
If you don't know that there is a bot doing patches, then that proves it
is so good that people do not realize it :)
> People are trying to
> bot away the kconfig related messages I send out - which I think is a
> very good idea - and I'd like to know what level that bot should reach
> before people can get out of its way.
>
> (I happen to think that the stuff I currently do is best done with a
> human filter applied.)
Please stick with a human filter, that's the best thing possible.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists