[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <54D3CD58.4030902@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 21:06:48 +0100
From: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
To: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 3/6] clk: Make clk API return per-user struct clk
instances
On 05/02/15 20:44, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>> +void __clk_put(struct clk *clk)
>> > +{
>> > + if (!clk || WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(clk)))
>> > + return;
>> > +
>> > + clk_core_put(clk->core);
>> > + kfree(clk);
>
> Why do we have kfree() here? clk_get() doesn't allocate the data structure
> being freed here. What happens if we do clk_get(), clk_put(), clk_get()
> on same clock?
>
> I suspect __clk_free_clk() should be called in __clk_release() callback
> instead, but then there is an issue of safely getting reference to
> struct clk from struct clk_core pointer.
Please ignore this comment, I missed __clk_create_clk() calls in clkdev.c
Anyway, in current -next I'm seeing random pointer dereferences while
booting Odroid U3, I'll get back to debugging this tomorrow morning.
--
Regards,
Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists