[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54D4C95D.30909@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 15:02:05 +0100
From: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alban Browaeys <alban.browaeys@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: Rename child_node to clks_node to avoid confusion
On 02/06/2015 01:19 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> The child_node member of struct clk is named the same as the
> child_node member of struct clk_core. Let's rename the struct
> clk's member to clks_node to avoid getting confused with the
> child_node member of struct clk_core and to match the name of the
> list head, clks.
>
> Cc: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
> Cc: Alban Browaeys <alban.browaeys@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Yeah, I like this better.
Reviewed-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
Thanks,
Tomeu
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index 5469d7714f5d..315dc22b7356 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ struct clk {
> const char *con_id;
> unsigned long min_rate;
> unsigned long max_rate;
> - struct hlist_node child_node;
> + struct hlist_node clks_node;
> };
>
> /*** locking ***/
> @@ -851,10 +851,10 @@ static void clk_core_get_boundaries(struct clk_core *clk,
> *min_rate = 0;
> *max_rate = ULONG_MAX;
>
> - hlist_for_each_entry(clk_user, &clk->clks, child_node)
> + hlist_for_each_entry(clk_user, &clk->clks, clks_node)
> *min_rate = max(*min_rate, clk_user->min_rate);
>
> - hlist_for_each_entry(clk_user, &clk->clks, child_node)
> + hlist_for_each_entry(clk_user, &clk->clks, clks_node)
> *max_rate = min(*max_rate, clk_user->max_rate);
> }
>
> @@ -2376,7 +2376,7 @@ struct clk *__clk_create_clk(struct clk_hw *hw, const char *dev_id,
> clk->max_rate = ULONG_MAX;
>
> clk_prepare_lock();
> - hlist_add_head(&clk->child_node, &hw->core->clks);
> + hlist_add_head(&clk->clks_node, &hw->core->clks);
> clk_prepare_unlock();
>
> return clk;
> @@ -2385,7 +2385,7 @@ struct clk *__clk_create_clk(struct clk_hw *hw, const char *dev_id,
> void __clk_free_clk(struct clk *clk)
> {
> clk_prepare_lock();
> - hlist_del(&clk->child_node);
> + hlist_del(&clk->clks_node);
> clk_prepare_unlock();
>
> kfree(clk);
> @@ -2663,7 +2663,7 @@ void __clk_put(struct clk *clk)
>
> clk_prepare_lock();
>
> - hlist_del(&clk->child_node);
> + hlist_del(&clk->clks_node);
> clk_core_set_rate_nolock(clk->core, clk->core->req_rate);
> owner = clk->core->owner;
> kref_put(&clk->core->ref, __clk_release);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists