[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1423252925-14451-2-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:01:58 -0500
From: riel@...hat.com
To: oleg@...hat.com
Cc: dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, sbsiddha@...il.com,
luto@...capital.net, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] x86, fpu: unlazy_fpu: don't reset thread.fpu_counter
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
It is not clear why the "else" branch clears ->fpu_counter, this makes
no sense.
If use_eager_fpu() then this has no effect. Otherwise, if we actually
wanted to prevent fpu preload after the context switch we would need to
reset it unconditionally, even if __thread_has_fpu().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/i387.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c b/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
index 47348653503a..c3b92c0975cd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/i387.c
@@ -122,8 +122,7 @@ void unlazy_fpu(struct task_struct *tsk)
if (__thread_has_fpu(tsk)) {
__save_init_fpu(tsk);
__thread_fpu_end(tsk);
- } else
- tsk->thread.fpu_counter = 0;
+ }
preempt_enable();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlazy_fpu);
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists