[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1423252925-14451-7-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:02:03 -0500
From: riel@...hat.com
To: oleg@...hat.com
Cc: dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, sbsiddha@...il.com,
luto@...capital.net, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/8] x86,fpu: use an explicit if/else in switch_fpu_prepare
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Use an explicit if/else branch after __save_init_fpu(old) in
switch_fpu_prepare. This makes substituting the assignment
with a call to task_disable_lazy_fpu() in the next patch easier
to review.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h
index c1f66261ad12..04063751ac80 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h
@@ -440,8 +440,9 @@ static inline fpu_switch_t switch_fpu_prepare(struct task_struct *old, struct ta
new->thread.fpu_counter > 5);
if (__thread_has_fpu(old)) {
if (!__save_init_fpu(old))
- cpu = ~0;
- old->thread.fpu.last_cpu = cpu;
+ old->thread.fpu.last_cpu = ~0;
+ else
+ old->thread.fpu.last_cpu = cpu;
old->thread.fpu.has_fpu = 0; /* But leave fpu_owner_task! */
/* Don't change CR0.TS if we just switch! */
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists