[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150206211708.GA25967@amd>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 22:17:08 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Quentin Lambert <lambert.quentin@...il.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/base: Remove unnecessary OOM message
On Fri 2015-02-06 13:04:30, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 21:58 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Fri 2015-02-06 16:39:12, Quentin Lambert wrote:
> > > This patch fix checkpatch warnings concerning the possible
> > > duplication of an "out of memory" message.
> >
> > So, instead of nice and readable "not enough memory for clock..." we
> > get OOM, stackdump, and backtrace...? Not sure it is improvement.
>
> All allocs without __GFP_NOWARN already gets an OOM and stackdump.
> These are just unnecessary.
"These" being human readable messages or ugly stackdumps?
Read what I have said. Figuring out what allocation failed from
unreliable backtrace is not fun.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists