[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150207102436.GB5206@mwanda>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 13:24:36 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Quentin Lambert <lambert.quentin@...il.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/base: Remove unnecessary OOM message
Facts:
1) None of these four error messages will ever be printed.
http://lwn.net/Articles/627419/
2) These messages are a waste of RAM.
Debatable:
1) These messages are bad style and distracting. Simple code is better.
2) The normal OOM message is enough to find which allocation failed.
Not everbody, but a lot of people write these kinds of error messages
with their brain on auto-pilot because they think they *should* do it.
It's quite common to do things like printk("dev is NULL. %s",
dev->name);. I'm happy for this checkpatch warning because it hopefully
bumps people out of mindless mode and makes them think about error
messages.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists